An architecture review that avoided a ~$400k rebuild
A non-technical founder was about to commit to an architecture that wouldn’t survive their own roadmap. A focused advisory engagement caught it early and set a defensible path.
// The problem
The team had chosen a single denormalized store and a synchronous design that would collapse once multi-tenant analytics and a planned data product landed. Investors wanted a technical story.
// The approach
- Ran a structured architecture and security review against the actual 18-month roadmap.
- Identified the data-model dead end and modeled the cost of changing later vs. now.
- Proposed a pragmatic event-sourced core with a separate analytical store (ClickHouse).
- Designed the hiring plan and interview rubric for the first two backend hires.
- Set up weekly office hours and a maintained ADR log and risk register.
Two hours into the review he’d found the thing that would have cost us our Series A. Best money we spent that year.
Case studies, metrics, prior companies, and testimonials in this template are illustrative and anonymized for demonstration; they do not name or represent any real client or employer and are not a guarantee of future results. Outcomes vary by system, team, and constraints.